User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-S5620-Vodafone/MIDP 2.1/CLDC 1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-S5620-Vodafone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-S5620-Vodafone MIDPcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeTouchwiz SamsungMontemobile-browseryescloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SamsungGT-S5620smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungGT-S5620-Vodafonecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Touchwiz SamsungMontemobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SamsungGT S5620Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:12 | by ThaDafinser