User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061025 Firefox/1.5.0.8
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Windows 95 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 1.5Gecko 1.0Win95 95Windows DesktopDesktop0.061 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 1.5.0.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 1.5.0.8closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.204 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 1.5Gecko Windows 95desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 1.5.0.8close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 1.5.0closeWindows 95 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 1.5.0.8closeWindows 95 closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 1.5.0.8Gecko 20061025Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.4 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 1.5.0.8Gecko 1.8.0Windows 95desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 1.5.0.8closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 1.5.0.11closeWindows XPNovarraCTS reformatting proxyOther Non-Mobilecloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:11 | by ThaDafinser