User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:34.0) Gecko/20100101 /34.0a1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
Firefox 34.0MacOSX 10.734.0 AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 34.0Gecko 34.0MacOSX 10.7AppleMacintoshDesktop0.051 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:34.0closeOS X 10.7desktop-browsercloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mac 10.7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeOS X 10.7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeMac OS X 10.7closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 34.0closeOS X 10.7closecloseclosecloseclose0.147 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 34.0Gecko 20100101Mac OS X 10.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko 34.0OS X Lion 10.7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:11 | by ThaDafinser