User agent detail

mozilla/5.0 (linux; android 4.2.2; at374 build/jdq39) applewebkit/537.36 (khtml, like gecko) chrome/33.0.1750.166 safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
Chrome 33.0.1750.166Android 4.2.2Blink ToshibaRegza AT374tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.057 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeAndroid desktop-browsercloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.2ToshibaRegza AT374tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeandroid closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.166WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 537.36 closeclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.092 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:11 | by ThaDafinser