User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; xx;) AppleWebKit/534(KHTML, like Gecko) NX/2.0 (DTV; HTML; R1.0;) InettvBrowser/2.2 (00E064;UA46FS7000;0001;0001) TvpsExtInfo/A31002 (6A31AA40155FBC8EDC1468E7309DB736;22;T)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/samsung.yaml
NetFront NX 2.0 Webkit 534SamsungSmart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront NX 2.0close media-playercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows XPdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows XP UA46FS7000closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.054 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet TV Browser 2.2WebKit 534Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront NX 2.0Webkit 534 SamsungSmart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
InternetTVBrowser closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:10 | by ThaDafinser