User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.63 Safari/537.36 QIHU 360SE
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-816.php
360 Secure Browser 0.0Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
360 Secure Browser WebKit Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.136 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
360 Browser WebKit Windows 7desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 31.0.1650closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.63WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
360 Safe Explorer Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:09 | by ThaDafinser