User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-DE; rv:99.0) Gecko/201212231 Firefox/25.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
Firefox 25.0Linux unknown25.0 unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 25.0Gecko 25.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.061 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 25.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 25.0.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 25.0Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 25.0.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 25.0.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 25.0.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 25.0.0Gecko 201212231Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 25.0.0Gecko 99.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 25.0.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 25.0closeWindows 8Desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:09 | by ThaDafinser