User agent detail

LG-KU886 Obigo/WAP2.0 MIDP-2.0/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGKU886 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo JAVA LGKU886Mobile Phoneyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-KU886 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo WAP 2.0close LGKU886mobile-browseryescloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo WAP2 LGKU886smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 2.0close LGKU886closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo WAP2 Browser WAP2 LGLGKU886closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.415 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo WAP 2.0 LGKU886mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:08 | by ThaDafinser