User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; Lenovo A5500-HV Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/44.0.2403.133 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-732.php
Chrome 44.0Android 4.4unknown LenovoIdeatab A8-50 WI-FI + 3GTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 44.0Blink Android 4.4LenovoIdeatab A8-50 WI-FI + 3GTabletyesyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.133closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.133closeAndroid 4.4.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.25 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 44.0Blink Android 4.4LenovoA5500-HVsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.133closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 44.0.2403closeAndroid 4.4.2LenovoA5500-HVcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.133WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 44Blink Android 4.4.2LenovoIdeaTab A5500tabletyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.133closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4LenovoA5500-hvTabletyesyescloseclose0.11 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:08 | by ThaDafinser