User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-AU) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.114 Safari/537.36 Puffin/4.1.4IT
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-810.php
Puffin 4.1iOS unknownunknown AppleiPadTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Puffin 4.1WebKit iOS AppleiPadTabletyesyes0.104 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Puffin 4.1.4closeiOS AppleiPadmobile-browseryescloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Puffin 4.1WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Puffin 4.1.4closeLinux AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Puffin 4.1.4WebKit 537.36 iPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Puffin 4.1.4Blink iOS iPadtabletyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:08 | by ThaDafinser