User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 2.3.4; en-US; GT-I9100P) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.7.0.520 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 9.7Android 2.3unknown SamsungGalaxy S II NFCMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.7U2 Android 2.3SamsungGalaxy S II NFCMobile Phoneyesyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close MotorolaXT862mobile-browseryescloseclose0.277 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.7 Android 2.3SamsungGALAXY S IIsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.7.0closeAndroid 2.3.4SamsungGT-I9100Pcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.7.0.520 SamsungMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.7Gecko Android 2.3.4SamsungGalaxy S IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.031 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 2.3SamsungGT-I9100PSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:07 | by ThaDafinser