User agent detail

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.20 Safari/537.36 OPR/15.0.1147.18 (Edition Next)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Opera 15.0.1147 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneric CrawlerBot/Crawler0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 15.0.1147.18closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.20closeOS X 10.7.5desktop-browsercloseclose0.2 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Next 15.0Blink Mac 10.7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 15.0.1147.18closeOS X 10.7.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 15.0.1147closeMac OS X 10.7.5closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.20closeOS X 10.7.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.113 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 15.0.1147.18WebKit 537.36Mac OS X 10.7.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.401 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Next 15.0Blink OS X Lion 10.7desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 15.0.1147.18closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 15.0.1147.18closeWindows 8Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:07 | by ThaDafinser