User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.115 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-716.php
Chrome 40.0Win10 10.0unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 40.0Blink Win10 10.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.152 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.115closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.115closeWindows 10.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 40.0Blink Windows 10desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.115closeWindows 10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 40.0.2214closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.115closeWindows 10 closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.115WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 40Blink Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.115closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 40.0.2214.115closeWindows 10Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:07 | by ThaDafinser