User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Maxthon/4.3.2.1000 Chrome/30.0.1599.101 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
Maxthon 4.3Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Maxthon 4.3Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.101closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Maxthon 4.3.2.1000closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Maxthon 4.3WebKit Windows 7desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.101closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Maxthon 4.3.2closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Maxthon 4.3.2.1000closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.055 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Maxthon 4.3.2.1000WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Maxthon 4.3.2Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.101closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:07 | by ThaDafinser