User agent detail

Links (2.1pre22; NetBSD 2.0.2 i386; 80x48)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
Links 2.1NetBSD 2.0.2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Links 2.1 NetBSD Desktop0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Links closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Links 2.1pre22closeBSD 2.0.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Links 2.1Text-based NetBSD 2.0desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeNetBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Links 2.1closeNetBSD 2.0.2closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Links 2.1pre22closeNetBSD 2.0.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Links 2.1pre22 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Links 2.1 NetBSD 2.0.2closeclose0.027 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:06 | by ThaDafinser