User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.1.1; LG-H343 Build/LMY47V) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/42.0.2311.111 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-lg.yaml
Chrome 42Android 5.1.1Blink 537.36LGRisiomobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 42.0Blink Android 5.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.142 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.111closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311.111closeAndroid 5.1.1GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.266 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 42.0Blink Android 5.1LGH343smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.111closeAndroid 5.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311closeAndroid 5.1.1LGH343closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 5.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.069 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 42.0.2311.111WebKit 537.36Android 5.1.1LGLGH343closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 42Blink Android 5.1.1LGRisiomobile:smartyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.111closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 5.1LGLG-H343Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.043 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:05 | by ThaDafinser