User agent detail

Mozilla/4.08 (DTV;NetTV/1.0) NetFront/3.1 InettvBrowser/1.0(0050C9;010;001;000)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Generic_Inettv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.1NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.033 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.1close GenericSmartTVmobile-browseryescloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.1NetFront PhilipsMX275smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.08close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.1close closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet TV Browser 1.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.1 Maspro DenkohSmart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
InternetTVBrowser closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:05 | by ThaDafinser