User agent detail

MOZILLA50 (SYMBIANOS92 U SERIES60/31 NOKIA6124C/
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia6124C Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries60 31Nokia6124 classicmobile-browseryescloseclose0.183 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 31 Symbian OS Series 60 31Nokia6124Csmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close Nokia6124Ccloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 closeSYMBIANOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser Symbian Nokiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series60 31Nokia6124 classicmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:04 | by ThaDafinser