User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux i686; rv:28.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/28.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-434.php
Firefox 28.0Ubuntu unknown28.0 unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 28.0Gecko 28.0Ubuntu Linux DesktopDesktop0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 28.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 28.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.245 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 28.0Gecko Ubuntu desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 28.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 28.0closeUbuntu closeclosecloseclose0.028 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 28.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.096 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 28.0Gecko 20100101Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 28.0Gecko 28.0Ubuntu desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 28.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.089 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:03 | by ThaDafinser