User agent detail

LG-KF700-Orange/v10a Browser/Obigo-Q05A/3.12 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 Java/ASVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UNTRUSTED/1.0 UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; es-LA; LG-KF700-Orange) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.3.0.326 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGKF700-Orange Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 5.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.062 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-KF700-Orange v10acloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.3 LGKF700smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.3.0close LGKF700-Orangecloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.136 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser LGLGKF700closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.488 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 5AGecko LGKF700mobile:featureyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UCBrowser Java Applet 9close LGKF700Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.052 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:03 | by ThaDafinser