User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-492.php
Thunderbird 17.0Win7 6.117.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Thunderbird 17.0Gecko 17.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Thunderbird 17.0.8closeWindows 6.1email-clientcloseclose0.215 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Thunderbird 17.0 Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Thunderbird 17.0.8closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Thunderbird 17.0.8closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 17.0Gecko 20130801Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Thunderbird 17.0.8Gecko 17.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:03 | by ThaDafinser