User agent detail

Chrome LINUX 45.0.2454.85 (4c2743615eaa2806ad014c59bf6acbb652cf3aa8)-devel
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-849.php
yesFake ChromeBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake ChromeBot/Crawler0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome LINUXcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.419 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
No result found
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:03 | by ThaDafinser