User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; IRIX64 IP35; xx; rv:1.8.1.25pre) Gecko/20121113 SeaMonkey/1.1.20pre
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-seamonkey.yaml
SeaMonkey 1.1.20IRIX Gecko 1.8.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.8Gecko 1.8IRIX64 Desktop0.091 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
SeaMonkey 1.1.20precloseIRIX desktop-browsercloseclose0.181 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SeaMonkey 1.1Gecko IRIX 64desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
SeaMonkey 1.1.20preclose closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 1.1.20close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
SeaMonkey 1.1.20precloseIRIX closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Seamonkey 1.1.20preGecko 20121113IRIX closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SeaMonkey 1.1.20Gecko 1.8.1IRIX desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:03 | by ThaDafinser