User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; NetCast; U) AppleWebKit/537.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.137 Safari/537.31 SmartTV/6.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/lg.yaml
Blink 537.31LGwebOS TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 34.0Blink Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.213 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 34.0Blink GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 34.0.1847closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.177 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.137WebKit 537.31Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.466 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Blink LGwebOS TVtelevisioncloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:02 | by ThaDafinser