User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux;u;Android 2.3.7;zh-cn;) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML,like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1 (compatible; +http://www.baidu.com/search/spider.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
yesBaidu Mobile SearchBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesBaidu Mobile SearchBot/Crawler0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.7GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesBaidu SpiderSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.7closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesspiderclose0 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.7closecloseclosecloseclose0.122 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesBaiduspiderclose0.048 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.032 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:02 | by ThaDafinser