User agent detail

W3S/Ready (Windows NT 6.1; Presto/2.12.423; Opera/12.18) AppleWebkit/537.36 Edge/12.246
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/camouflage.yaml
Edge 12 12.18Windows 7EdgeHTML 12desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.18closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.18closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.195 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Microsoft Edge 12.246Edge Windows 7desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Edge 12.246closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Edge 12.246closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.18closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.068 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Edge 12.246Presto 2.12.423Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Edge 12 12.18EdgeHTML 12Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.18closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:02 | by ThaDafinser