User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080208 Mandriva/2.0.0.13-1mdv2008.1 (2008.1) Firefox/2.0.0.13
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Mandriva 2008.1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 2.0Gecko 1.8Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.253 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 2.0.0.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 2.0.0.13closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.181 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 2.0Gecko Mandriva 2.0desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 2.0.0.13closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 2.0.0closeMandriva 2008.1closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 2.0.0.13closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.187 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 2.0.0.13Gecko 20080208Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.416 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 2.0.0.13Gecko 1.8.1Mandriva 2008desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 2.0.0.13closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:02 | by ThaDafinser