User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-A937/A937UCJE1!(zW( Opera/9.80 (BREW 5.0.3; Opera Mobi/BP206/135; U; en) Presto/2.4.15 Version/10.00 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-A937 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 10.00close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 10.00Presto Brew 5.0SamsungSGH-A937smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.00 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDCclose closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 10.0closeBREW 5.0.3SamsungSGH-A937closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile close closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.0Presto 2.4.15 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 10.00Presto 2.4.15Brew 5.0.3SamsungSGH-A937mobile:featureyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.00closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:02 | by ThaDafinser