User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-de) AppleWebKit/531.2+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/531.2+ Debian/squeeze (2.30.6-1) Epiphany/2.30.6
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-525.php
Epiphany 2.30Linux unknownunknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Epiphany 2.30WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Epiphany 2.30.6closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Epiphany 2.30WebKit Debian desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Epiphany 2.30.6closeDebian closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Epiphany 2.30.6closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Epiphany 2.30.6WebKit 531.2Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
GNOME Web 2.30.6Webkit 531.2Debian desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:01 | by ThaDafinser