User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.101 Safari/537.36 OPR/17.0.1241.53
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-323.php
Opera 17.0MacOSX 10.7unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 17.0Blink MacOSX 10.7AppleMacintoshDesktop0.204 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 17.0.1241.53closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 17.0.1241.53closeOS X 10.7.5desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 17.0Blink Mac 10.7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 17.0.1241.53closeOS X 10.7.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 17.0.1241closeMac OS X 10.7.5closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.101closeOS X 10.7.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 17.0.1241.53WebKit 537.36Mac OS X 10.7.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.552 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 17.0Blink OS X Lion 10.7desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 17.0.1241.53closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:01 | by ThaDafinser