User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; A1-811 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.99 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-525.php
Chrome 32.0Android 4.2unknown AcerIconia ATabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 32.0Blink Android 4.2AcerIconia ATabletyesyes0.147 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.246 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 32.0Blink Android 4.2AcerIconia Atabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 32.0.1700closeAndroid 4.2.2AcerA1-811closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.086 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.99WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 32Blink Android 4.2.2AcerIconia A1-811tabletyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 36closeAndroid 4.2AcerA1-811Tabletyesyescloseclose0.061 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:01 | by ThaDafinser