User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 8.12; MSIEMobile 6.0) LG-GW550 Obigo/WAP2.0 MIDP-2.0/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
Obigo WAP 2.0Windows Mobile 6.5 LGGW550mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IEMobile 8.12Trident 3.1WinCE Mobile Phoneyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 8.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 8.12closeWindows LGGW550mobile-browseryescloseclose0.205 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 8.12Trident Windows CE LGGW550smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 8.12closeWindows CE LGGW550closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 8.12closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.112 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo WAP2 Browser WAP2 Windows LGLGGW550closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.429 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo WAP 2.0 Windows Mobile 6.5LGGW550mobile:smartyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile LGGW550Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:00 | by ThaDafinser