User agent detail

JUC (Linux; U; 4.0.1; zh-cn; HTC_HD7_T9399+; 480*800) UCWEB7.9.3.103/139/800
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCHD7 T9399+ Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.9WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux HTCA810emobile-browseryescloseclose0.266 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.9 GNU/Linux HTCHD7 T9399+smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.9.3closeAndroid 4.0.1HTCHD7 T9399+closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.9.3.103closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.079 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.9.3.103 Linux HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.9 Android 4.0.1HTCHD7mobile:smartyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:00 | by ThaDafinser