User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_1) AppleWebkit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/13.0.782.215 Safari/535.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-195.php
Chrome 13.0MacOSX 10.7unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 13.0WebKit MacOSX 10.7AppleMacintoshDesktop0.214 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 13.0.782.215closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 13.0.782.215closeOS X 10.7.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.205 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 13.0WebKit Mac 10.7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 13.0.782.215closeOS X 10.7.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 13.0.782closeMac OS X 10.7.1closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 13.0.782.215closeOS X 10.7.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.094 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 13.0.782.215WebKit 535.1Mac OS X 10.7.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 13Webkit 535.1OS X Lion 10.7desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 13.0.782.215closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 13.0.782.215closeMac OS X 10.7.1Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:59 | by ThaDafinser