User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Symbian/3; Series60/5.2 Nokia808PureView/112.020.0309; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/C
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia808PureView Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.044 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries60 5.2Nokia808 PureViewmobile-browseryescloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 5.2 Symbian^3 Nokia808PureViewsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 112.020.0309;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 5.2closeSymbian^3 Nokia808PureViewcloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 closeSymbian closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 808PureViewcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series60 5.2Nokia808 PureViewmobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 5.0NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:59 | by ThaDafinser