User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.3; en-gb; KFTT Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.25 like Chrome/34.0.1847.137 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Amazon Silk 3.25 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 3.25Blink Android 4.0AmazonKindle Fire HD 7Tabletyesyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 3.25closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Amazon Silk 3.25closeAndroid 4.0.3AmazonKFTTmobile-browseryescloseclose0.266 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 34.0Blink Android 4.0AmazonKindle Fire HDtabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 3.25closeAndroid 4.0.3AmazonKindle Fire HD 7"closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.087 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk 3.25WebKit 537.36Fire OS AmazonKindle Fire HD 7"closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Silk 3.25Blink FireOS 2AmazonKindle Fire HDtabletyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 37closeAndroid 4.0AmazonKFTTTabletyesyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:58 | by ThaDafinser