User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux i686; Opera Mobi/46154; MeeGo) Presto/2.11.355 Version/12.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-meego.yaml
Opera Mobile 12.10MeeGo Presto 2.11.355mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.10Presto 2.12Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 12.10closeLinux OperaOpera for Series 60mobile-browseryescloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 12.10Presto MeeGo yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 12.10closeMeeGo closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile 12.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose1.736 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.10Presto 2.11.355Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.622 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 12.10Presto 2.11.355MeeGo mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.10closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 5.1close LGVN270Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:57 | by ThaDafinser