User agent detail

Mozilla/4.1 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Symbian OS) Opera 6.0 [de]./MOT-A925./P243
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-symbian.yaml
Opera Mobile 6.0UIQ MotorolaA925mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 6.0closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.234 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 6.0Presto Symbian OS MotorolaA925.smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera MOT-A925.close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 6.0closeSymbian OS MotorolaA925closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 6.0closeSymbian OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 6.0 Symbian closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.416 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 6.0 UIQ MotorolaA925mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close MotorolaA925Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:56 | by ThaDafinser