User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; M8 pro Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.72 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PipoM8pro Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 29.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.054 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.72closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.72closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.25797 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 29.0Blink Android 4.2tabletyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.72closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 29.0.1547closeAndroid 4.2.2PipoM8procloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.72WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40796 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 29Blink Android 4.2.2PiPOM8 Protabletyescloseclose0.039 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.72closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.058 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:56 | by ThaDafinser