User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/4.3; Linux) KHTML/4.3.4 (like Gecko) Red Hat Enterprise Linux/4.3.4-19.el6
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Konqueror 4.3Red Hat 4.3.4KHTML 4.3.4desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Konqueror 4.3KHTML Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.134 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 4.3closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18698 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 4.3KHTML Red Hat 4.3desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 4.3;closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.3closeRed Hat closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 4.3closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04999 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 4.3 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.50195 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 4.3KHTML 4.3.4Red Hat 6desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:56 | by ThaDafinser