User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Vodafone/1.0/LG-GW520
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGGW520 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close LGGW520mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18998 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
LGGW520smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LGGW520closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0 LGLGGW520closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40496 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LGGW520mobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile LG-GW520closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close LGGC-900Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.043 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:55 | by ThaDafinser