User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS x86_64 5116.115.4) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.152 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/pc_misc.yaml
Chrome 33.0.1750.152ChromeOS x86_64 5116.115.4 pc Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 33.0Blink ChromeOS Linux DesktopDesktop0.043 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.152closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.152closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18098 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 33.0Blink Chrome OS 5116.115desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.152closeChrome OS 33.0.1750.152closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 33.0.1750closeChrome OS 5116.115.4closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.152closeChrome OS 5116.115.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.05499 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.152WebKit 537.36ChromeOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.55994 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 33Blink Chrome OS desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.152closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 33.0.1750.152closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:54 | by ThaDafinser