User agent detail

MOT-c350/G_09.04.35R MIB/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Motorolac350 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Motorola Internet Browser 2.0 MotorolaC350Mobile Phoneyes0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-c350 Gcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Motorola Internet Browser 2.0close MotorolaC350mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20198 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Motorolac350smartphoneyes0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close Motorolac350closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MIB 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.15498 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Motorola Internet Browser 2.0 Motorolac350mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close MotorolaC350Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.033 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:54 | by ThaDafinser