User agent detail

IAC/1.0 (H31IA;like Gecko;OpenBrowser) WWW Browser/ver1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/carrier-emobile.yaml
EMOBILE Browser 1.0 InventecH31IAmobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IAC 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
EMOBILE Browser 1.0close InventecH31IAmobile-browseryescloseclose0.17998 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05399 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Gecko based browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40296 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
EMOBILE Browser 1.0 InventecH31IAmobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
emobile closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:54 | by ThaDafinser