User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0 [FBAN/FBIOS;FBAV/8.0.0.28.18;FBBV/1665515;FBDV/iPhone4,1;FBMD/iPhone;FBSN/iPhone OS;FBSV/7.0.4;FBSS/2; FBCR/Telekom.de;FBID/phone;FBLC/de_DE;FBOP/5]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AppleiPhone4,1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 10.0Gecko 10.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.056 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeLinux AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.19798 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Facebook 8.0 iOS AppleiPhone 4Ssmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 10.0closeLinux closeiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Facebook 8.0.0closeLinux AppleiPhone4,1closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 10.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.09199 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Facebook iOS App 8.0.0.28.18Gecko 20100101iOS AppleiPhone 4Scloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.39896 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Facebook Gecko 10.0iOS AppleiPhone 4Smobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 10.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.1closeiOS AppleiPhoneFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:53 | by ThaDafinser