User agent detail

Opera/9.24 (X11; SunOS i86pc; U; en)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-solaris.yaml
Opera 9.24Solaris desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 9.24Presto 2.0SunOS Desktop0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.24closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.24closeSolaris desktop-browsercloseclose0.20298 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.24Presto Solaris desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.24closeSunOS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.24closeSolaris closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.24closeSunOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.07199 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.24 SunOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40896 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 9.24 Solaris desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.24closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 9.26closeIntel Mac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:53 | by ThaDafinser