User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux; U; Diga; de-DE) AppleWebKit/537.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Diga/3.7.0 Chrome/23.0.1271.97 Safari/537.11
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/panasonic.yaml
Webkit 537.11PanasonicDigatelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.97closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 23.0.1271.97closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.17598 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 23.0WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.97closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 23.0.1271closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 23.0.1271.97closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 23.0.1271.97WebKit 537.11Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41396 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 537.11 PanasonicDigatelevisioncloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.97closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 23.0.1271.64closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:53 | by ThaDafinser