User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (BREW; Opera Mini/5.43/26.1319; U; en) Presto/2.8.119 320X240 LG VN250271
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGVN250271 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini Presto 2.2Brew 2.0Mobile Deviceyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.80closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 5.43close LGVN270mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18398 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 5.43Presto Brew LGVN250271smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 5.43close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 5.43closeBREW LGVN250271closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 5.43close closecloseclosecloseclose0.16098 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 5.43Presto 2.8.119 LGLG VN250271closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40096 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 5.43Presto 2.8.119Brew LGVN250271mobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.80closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 5.1close LGVN270Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:53 | by ThaDafinser