User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; LIFETAB_S9714 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.166 Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MedionLifetab S9714 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.0MedionLifeTab S9714Tabletyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.29297 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.0MedionLifetab S9714tabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.0.4MedionLifetab S9714closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.05899 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166WebKit 535.19Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42396 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Android 4.0.4MedionLifetab S9714tabletyescloseclose0.031 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 4.0MedionLIFETAB S9714Tabletyesyescloseclose0.078 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:52 | by ThaDafinser