User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; TT7026MW Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/42.0.2311.109 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 42.0Android 4.2unknown DigmaOptima 7.6Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 42.0Blink Android 4.2DigmaOptima 7.6Mobile Phoneyesyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.109closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 42.0.2311.109closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.27297 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 42.0Blink Android 4.2tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.109closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 42.0.2311closeAndroid 4.2.2TT7026MWcloseclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 42.0.2311.109WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40196 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 42Blink Android 4.2.2TT7026MWtabletyescloseclose0.10301 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.109closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.12 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:52 | by ThaDafinser